I recently visited the cottage in Nether Stowey, Somerset, where the poet Coleridge lived between 1797 and 1800. He was not born there and three years is not very long to make a place significant. But it was from there that he developed his collaboration with Wordsworth on the groundbreaking collection Lyrical Ballads and where he wrote many of his most significant poems.
How should such
places be conserved and maintained? Following his brief residence at nearby
Alfoxden to be near Coleridge, Wordsworth moved back to his native Lake
District to the similarly iconic Dove Cottage. In spite of its being a hive for
tourists seeking literary honey, in spite of its bookshop and its contextualistion
as a place of pilgrimage, there is a sense of the lives of William and Dorothy
when they lived there. The cottage at Nether Stowey seems, in contrast, empty
of the presence of Coleridge. It has recently been renovated by the National
Trust so perhaps the newness of its atmosphere contributes to this. The cottage
has also been extended since 1800 and has since had other uses while Dove
Cottage has remained comparatively intact.
In the absence of
very many Coleridgean artefacts in the cottage apart from an inkstand, attempts
have been made to recreate the settings of some of the poems. In the living room
a crade has been placed by the flickering fireplace, and a writing desk in the
corner gestures to the composition of ‘Frost at Midnight’ where his child “slumbers
peacefully” in the cradle while the poet is carried back to his own childhood
by the flickering flame in the hearth.
In the garden a
‘lime tree bower’ has been created to represent the poem ‘This Lime Tree Bower
My Prison’ and ferns planted next to it, presumably to echo those referred to in
the poem. Representation rather than recreation was perhaps all that was
possible in this location. It is one way of exhibiting a place that
remains significant in memory rather than as a manifestation of what is
remembered. The poems represented in the examples given above can be revisited
in a room containing editions of the poet’s work and recorded examples of some
of them. Other parts of the cottage, such as the kitchen, represent the
way of life of the period as much as that of the poet and his family, though
some emphasis is put in the interpretational material on the role of the poet’s
long-suffering wife Sara in the family’s domestic arrangements. One aspect of
the poet’s life is represented obliquely in the swathes of large opium-style
poppies in the garden, surely creating (rather than re-creating) a flowery
hinterland on the borders between irony and a tasteless joke. Never was the
poet’s distinction between ‘fancy’ and ‘imagination’ better represented, if not
in intention, then in representational fact.
Dove Cottage in 1882
No comments:
Post a Comment
What do you think?